<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>damnum absque injuria &#187; Horses, Dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/category/horses-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:38:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Partial Defense of Substantive Due Process</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/07/07/a-partial-defense-of-substantive-due-process/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2010/07/07/a-partial-defense-of-substantive-due-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 04:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horses, Dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=5637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NK asks, I presume rhetorically, if every stupid law is unconstitutional. This brings me to a topic I&#8217;ve been meaning to blog about since the McDonald decision: was the reasoning of the Alito plurality really that bad, or even all that different from Justice Thomas&#8217;s position? In other words, is a law forbidding law-abiding residents [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2010/07/07/a-partial-defense-of-substantive-due-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Money Is Not Speech&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/12/money-is-not-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/12/money-is-not-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 02:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horses, Dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=5307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most oft-quoted &#8211; and IMNSHO lamest &#8211; arguments in support of First Amendment &#8220;Reform&#8221; is that draconian restrictions on campaign contributions and ads are okey dokey under the First Amendment because &#8220;money is not speech.&#8221; Technically, of course, it&#8217;s not, but has anyone seriously considered the implications of the theory that money [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/12/money-is-not-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yawner of the Day</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2009/10/04/yawner-of-the-day-3/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2009/10/04/yawner-of-the-day-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 03:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horses, Dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=5022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whenever you hear the H-word, check twice, and a third time. Usually it&#8217;s some liberal screaming &#8220;hypocrisy&#8221; whenever a conservative proves to be human on an issue where liberals and conservatives generally agree (and where liberals are every bit as prone to failure as conservatives, but somehow their hypocrisy doesn&#8217;t count). When the right plays [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2009/10/04/yawner-of-the-day-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ikean 201</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2009/08/29/ikean-201/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2009/08/29/ikean-201/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horses, Dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language Police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2009/08/29/ikean-201/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Swedish names sound even dumber when butchered by Southerners.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2009/08/29/ikean-201/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ikean 101</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2009/08/29/ikean-101/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2009/08/29/ikean-101/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horses, Dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People Unclear On The Concept]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=4883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IKEA has an annoying habit of being too lazy to write instruction manuals for their furniture, relying instead on a bunch of cutesy drawings that are supposed to tell you what you need to do. Recently I purchased a bookshelf (Expedit) and learned this lesson the hard way. For future reference, this: means &#8220;on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2009/08/29/ikean-101/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Score One for the Birthers</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2009/08/12/score-one-for-the-birthers/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2009/08/12/score-one-for-the-birthers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horses, Dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=4799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fiorello La Guardia famously quipped that &#8220;I don&#8217;t often make a mistake, but when I do, it&#8217;s a beaut.&#8221; That quote applies to yours truly, as well. One aspect of the birther debate I&#8217;ve been pushing for months is that as long as Stanley Ann Dunham really was Barack Hussein Obama&#8217;s mother (and I don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2009/08/12/score-one-for-the-birthers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama Is Not My President</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2009/01/02/barack-obama-is-not-my-president-3/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2009/01/02/barack-obama-is-not-my-president-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 12:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horses, Dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=4213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, several commenters fell into the sarchasm when I pointed out something I thought would be obvious, so I&#8217;ll spell it out a bit more clearly now. Aas of today, January 2, 2008, the President of the United States of America is George W. Bush. Not Barack H. Obama. Therefore, Barack Obama is not my [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2009/01/02/barack-obama-is-not-my-president-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Airing of Grievances: North Carolinians</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/12/24/airing-of-grievances-north-carolinians/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2008/12/24/airing-of-grievances-north-carolinians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 22:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grievances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horses, Dead]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2008/12/24/airing-of-grievances-north-carolinians/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t been pinned yet so here&#8217;s one last grievance for the year. What&#8217;s up with the new &#8220;North Carolina Education Lottery,&#8221; which is all going to help our schools, with no offset against the general fund to help less popular expenditures? Every other state in the union learned the lesson the hard way, decades [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2008/12/24/airing-of-grievances-north-carolinians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Final Debate (Laphamized Whining)</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/10/15/final-debate-laphamized-whining/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2008/10/15/final-debate-laphamized-whining/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horses, Dead]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2008/10/15/final-debate-laphamized-whining/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know the debate hasn&#8217;t started yet but no matter, Obama won. Of course McCain won among FoxNews viewers, Drudge and Instapundit readers, uh-counters, Freepers and anyone who actually paid attention to what was said. None of that matters because Obama won big among the coveted can&#8217;t-see past their noses middle without whom no one, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2008/10/15/final-debate-laphamized-whining/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Allen&#8217;s Machaca</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/08/23/allens-machaca/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2006/08/23/allens-machaca/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horses, Dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/08/23/macaca-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Until recently, Virginia Senator George Allen was a shoo-in for easy reelection in November. All this changed at an August 11 campaign event, in which he mouthed off to tracker/stalker S.R. Sidarth. Allen said a few really dumb things in that exchange, and reports conflict as to which one sparked the greatest outrage. No one&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2006/08/23/allens-machaca/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

