Letter of the Day
The letter of the day is V, which stands for “vicious,” the only word that can come close to describing the depth to which Gloria Allwet has sunk today.
The letter of the day is V, which stands for “vicious,” the only word that can come close to describing the depth to which Gloria Allwet has sunk today.
Courtesy of Fresh Potatoes, below is the rap sheet of Rhonda Miller, presumably the same Rhonda Miller that Gloria “You Weren’t Supposed to Catch This Until Wednesday” Allred paraded today.
UPDATE: It turned out to be the wrong Rhonda Miller. I’ve left the other Rhonda Miller’s rap sheet below for completeness; note, however, that it has nothing to do with Arnold Schwarzenegger or the recall election.
John Kobylt of the John and Ken Show has exposed the lies of Arnold’s latest accuser, Rhonda Miller, who today falsely accused Arnold of pulling up her shirt, taking a photo of her breasts, and placing the photo on the ceiling of a trailer on the set. The hairdresser, Peter Tommil, called into the show to explain that he had taken the photos in question, with Ms. Miller’s consent, and that Arnold was nowhere near the scene when the photos were taken. According to the Freeper account (which I did not hear myself) John then proceeded, to elaborate on [what he then believed to be] Ms. Miller’s rap sheet, which included convictions for drug offenses, forgery, and prostitution. [UPDATE: Ignore the rap sheet - it applies to the wrong Rhonda Miller.]
Miller’s defamatory statement was made at Gloria Allred’s office, with Allred’s support. As a non-lawyer, Miller herself cannot be disciplined by the California Bar for her outrageous conduct. Allred, her attorney, can, and should be.
For the 80% of you who haven’t voted yet, there is only one rational choice left. Tomorrow, vote NO on puke politics, NO on libel, NO on the Los Angeles Times, YES on the recall, and YES on Schwarzenegger. On Wednesday, call the State Bar and ask them to look into what Gloria Allred knew about her prostitute/client’s statements, and when she knew it.
Here’s a picture of Miller, the druggie/prostitute/slimeball who probably won’t be working as a stunt woman in Hollywood anymore:
There’s only one downside to cancelling your subscription to the Daily Monopoly: once in a while they run some good stuff, too. Link via Kausfiles.
Via Rough & Tumble comes a story in today’s San Diego Union-Tribune arguing that the “drudge work” of a get out the vote campaign may determine the outcome of tomorrow’s election. Such “drudge work” is not to be confused with Drudge work, which is becoming increasingly irrelevant nowadays.
Several California Republic Online commentators, including me, have posted parting shots on the recall, in which each of us predicts who will win, by how much. So far, there seems to be a consensus that the L.A. Times’s last minute puke campaign will “work,” but only well enough to tighten the race, and not to change its result. In theory, we’ll know who was right by this time on Wednesday. In practice, now that the Democrat Party has taken to suing whenever elections don’t go their way, be ready for a month of Sore/Loserman-type challenges if the election is remotely close, particularly since Davis will probably be able to claim he won The Popular Vote.
Joe “Gray” Davis and Bob “Real Bullets” Mulholland offered regurgitated puke (but I repeat myself) of their own this morning. Here’s what Davis - who as recently as Thursday had promised not to use the exploits of the Gropenator as a campaign issue - has to say now:
If the news events over the last couple days have raised any doubts in your mind about the wisdom of electing Arnold Schwarzenegger, I say to you, come home, vote NO on the recall.
Umm, no. There is a reason why we have two separate questions on the ballot with regard to the recall. One question concerns Gray Davis, and no one else. The other concerns the issue of who will replace him, should the recall succeed. So for anyone who was half-tempted to swallow Gray Davis’s non sequitur, here are the two coherent suggestions he could have given instead:
I have a confession to make. For the past seven weeks, I’ve been sitting on some stories I’ve heard from anonymous, uncorrobrated witnesses who have revealed even more wrongdoing by Arnold than has yet been revealed by the Drudge Report, the National Enquirer, the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times and the Weekly World News put together. I was planning on holding on to this information until after the election, but now I think it’s best that voters know the truth before the 80% of them who haven’t voted yet go to the polls on Wednesday Tuesday.
According to my sources, Arnold may or may not have done some or all of the following:
The Sacramento Bee buries the lede in this story about public conscience expert Joseph “Gray” Davis, who opined this morning that yesterday’s Nazi quote shocks it. The real story is the eighth paragraph, where Mr. Gray is quoted as saying:
I’m disturbed by what I’ve heard today. And I know the voters have a big decision to make in five days.
You heard the man. Governor Davis needs your support, so get out to the polls and vote for him next Wednesday.
Via the Angry Clam comes this story (German language) reporting that Arnold Schwarzenegger joined forces with a bunch of anti-Nazi punks in 1964 to bust up a rally by pro-Nazi punks. Here’s a quick and dirty Enlgish translation of the article:
Powered by WordPress. Stock photography by Matthew J. Stinson. Design by OFJ.