<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>damnum absque injuria &#187; Replacement Candidates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/category/politics/california-politics/davis-recall/replacement-candidates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:10:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Election Post-Mortem</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/08/election-post-mortem/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/08/election-post-mortem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Replacement Candidates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2003/10/08/396/election-post-mortem/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are the statewide returns on the race to replace. With 97.9% of the precincts counted, I think we can safely say that Arnold won, and with a lot more than 15% of the vote. Even the bogus argument about Davis winning &#8220;the popular vote&#8221; didn&#8217;t pan out. Early reports indicate that Davis himself has [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/08/election-post-mortem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rhonda&#8217;s Rap Sheet</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/06/rhondas-rap-sheet/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/06/rhondas-rap-sheet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Replacement Candidates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2003/10/06/388/rhondas-rap-sheet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Courtesy of Fresh Potatoes, below is the rap sheet of Rhonda Miller, presumably the same Rhonda Miller that Gloria &#8220;You Weren&#8217;t Supposed to Catch This Until Wednesday&#8221; Allred paraded today. UPDATE: It turned out to be the wrong Rhonda Miller. I&#8217;ve left the other Rhonda Miller&#8217;s rap sheet below for completeness; note, however, that it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/06/rhondas-rap-sheet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Puke Politics and the Politically Puking Puke Politicians Who Puke It Politically</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/06/puke-politics-and-the-politically-puking-puke-politicians-who-puke-it-politically/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/06/puke-politics-and-the-politically-puking-puke-politicians-who-puke-it-politically/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Replacement Candidates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2003/10/06/387/puke-politics-and-the-politically-puking-puke-politicians-who-puke-it-politically/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Kobylt of the John and Ken Show has exposed the lies of Arnold&#8217;s latest accuser, Rhonda Miller, who today falsely accused Arnold of pulling up her shirt, taking a photo of her breasts, and placing the photo on the ceiling of a trailer on the set. The hairdresser, Peter Tommil, called into the show [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/06/puke-politics-and-the-politically-puking-puke-politicians-who-puke-it-politically/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Dirt on Arnold</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/04/more-dirt-on-arnold/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/04/more-dirt-on-arnold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Replacement Candidates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2003/10/04/378/more-dirt-on-arnold/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a confession to make. For the past seven weeks, I&#8217;ve been sitting on some stories I&#8217;ve heard from anonymous, uncorrobrated witnesses who have revealed even more wrongdoing by Arnold than has yet been revealed by the Drudge Report, the National Enquirer, the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times and the Weekly World [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/04/more-dirt-on-arnold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Guess He Didn&#8217;t Admire Adolf Too Much</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/03/i-guess-he-didnt-admire-adolf-too-much/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/03/i-guess-he-didnt-admire-adolf-too-much/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Replacement Candidates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2003/10/03/374/i-guess-he-didnt-admire-adolf-too-much/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via the Angry Clam comes this story (German language) reporting that Arnold Schwarzenegger joined forces with a bunch of anti-Nazi punks in 1964 to bust up a rally by pro-Nazi punks. Here&#8217;s a quick and dirty Enlgish translation of the article: Friday, October 3, 2002, 7:12 p.m. Central European Time Magazine: Schwarzenegger Disrupted Neonazi March [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/03/i-guess-he-didnt-admire-adolf-too-much/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Puke Politics</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/03/puke-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/03/puke-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Replacement Candidates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2003/10/03/372/puke-politics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Susan Estrich is not impressed (hat tip: Instapundit) by the L.A. Times&#8217;s last-minute hatchet job. She notes that contrary to popular opinion, none of the incidents alleged constitute crimes. She also predicts that this story will have little impact on the elcetion, particularly since it comes so late in the game, from a newspaper that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/03/puke-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Admired?  Didn&#8217;t Admire?</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/03/admired-didnt-admire/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/03/admired-didnt-admire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Replacement Candidates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2003/10/03/371/admired-didnt-admire/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like Arnold&#8217;s &#8220;admiration&#8221; for Hitler involved a language mistake, albeit not the one that I initially suspected. The New York Times has picked up the story about Schwarzenegger&#8217;s supposed admiration for Hitler (hat tip: Dan Weintraub). Quotable: But early this morning, Mr. Butler called back, saying he had driven back to his New [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/03/admired-didnt-admire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Late Hit(-ler)</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/02/another-late-hit-ler/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/02/another-late-hit-ler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Replacement Candidates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2003/10/02/368/another-late-hit-ler/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ABC (not the Australian one, believe it or not), has just proved that Godwin&#8217;s Law no longer applies only to Usenet, but now applies to traditional media as well. My initial reactions: As with today&#8217;s other hatchet job, the timing of this story is purely coincidental, and has absolutely nothing to do with the fact [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/02/another-late-hit-ler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arnold&#8217;s Twisted Sister, Dee</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/02/arnolds-twisted-sister-dee/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/02/arnolds-twisted-sister-dee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Replacement Candidates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2003/10/02/367/arnolds-twisted-sister-dee/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via Slings and Arrows comes this story from E! Online News, which states that Twisted Sister&#8217;s 1980s rock anthem &#8220;We&#8217;re Not Gonna Take It,&#8221; along with every other song on their 1984 album Stay Hungry, was inspired by Arnold Schwarzenegger. This is not good. Let&#8217;s take a look at every other song on the album: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/02/arnolds-twisted-sister-dee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Late Hit Piece</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/02/late-hit-piece/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/02/late-hit-piece/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Replacement Candidates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2003/10/02/364/late-hit-piece/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I realize that no one except maybe John Carroll has ever accused the Daily Monopoly L.A. Times of being Fair� or Balanced�, but assuming they are still in the &#8220;news&#8221; business, couldn&#8217;t they have reported this a little earlier in the campaign? Ironically, the Monopoly attempts to preemptively debunk any suspicions of partisanship with this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2003/10/02/late-hit-piece/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

