<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Election Guide &#8211; November 2005</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:50:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Conservative &#187; If You Live In California</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-38343</link>
		<dc:creator>California Conservative &#187; If You Live In California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/#comment-38343</guid>
		<description>[...] Scroll below for California Proposition ballot recommendations from Tom McClintock and KFI’s John and Ken. See also ballot recommendations by Prof Bainbridge and Xlrq. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scroll below for California Proposition ballot recommendations from Tom McClintock and KFI’s John and Ken. See also ballot recommendations by Prof Bainbridge and Xlrq. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Jawa Report</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-38342</link>
		<dc:creator>The Jawa Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/#comment-38342</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Californians, to the barricades!&lt;/strong&gt;

There&#039;s still time to vote for prop 73, a very common sense initiative that begins to restore the proper balance of family authority over the state&#039;s in making moral decisions. And for Prop 74--tenure for public school teachers? Please. Given...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Californians, to the barricades!</strong></p>
<p>There&#8217;s still time to vote for prop 73, a very common sense initiative that begins to restore the proper balance of family authority over the state&#8217;s in making moral decisions. And for Prop 74&#8211;tenure for public school teachers? Please. Given&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrestoPundit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; If You Live In California</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-38337</link>
		<dc:creator>PrestoPundit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; If You Live In California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/#comment-38337</guid>
		<description>[...] Scroll below for California Proposition ballot recommendations from Tom McClintock and KFI&#8217;s John and Ken. See also ballot recommendations by Prof Bainbridge and Xlrq. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scroll below for California Proposition ballot recommendations from Tom McClintock and KFI&#8217;s John and Ken. See also ballot recommendations by Prof Bainbridge and Xlrq. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FullosseousFlap&#8217;s Dental Blog &#187; California Special Election Watch: Flap&#8217;s Voter Guide for November 8</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-38330</link>
		<dc:creator>FullosseousFlap&#8217;s Dental Blog &#187; California Special Election Watch: Flap&#8217;s Voter Guide for November 8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 19:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/#comment-38330</guid>
		<description>[...] Xrlq [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Xrlq [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-38327</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/#comment-38327</guid>
		<description>I was.  Having resigned from teaching in 1993, I was not aware of the 1997 settlement.  Thanks for pointing it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was.  Having resigned from teaching in 1993, I was not aware of the 1997 settlement.  Thanks for pointing it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-38325</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/#comment-38325</guid>
		<description>You must have been working before the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/rctunctaa.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;settlement agreement&lt;/a&gt; from the &#039;right to work&#039; people</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must have been working before the <a href="http://www.nrtw.org/rctunctaa.htm" rel="nofollow">settlement agreement</a> from the &#8216;right to work&#8217; people</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-38323</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/#comment-38323</guid>
		<description>Sorry to disappoint, but &quot;my&quot; union was the California Teachers Association.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to disappoint, but &#8220;my&#8221; union was the California Teachers Association.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-38321</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/#comment-38321</guid>
		<description>&quot;You won’t get any of your money back&quot;

That&#039;s not what the LAtimes, or even the anti-union national &quot;right to work&quot; groups reported.  Maybe they were talking about public sector unions, and that&#039;s not what you had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You won’t get any of your money back&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what the LAtimes, or even the anti-union national &#8220;right to work&#8221; groups reported.  Maybe they were talking about public sector unions, and that&#8217;s not what you had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-38204</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/#comment-38204</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;To some people this is a choice. But you can also opt-out of giving to the union money that is not used for collective bargaining.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, you can&#039;t.  I know this firsthand because I&#039;ve tried.  The only thing you can opt out of is formal membership in the union, the right to vote in the union decisions, and any other fringe benefits that may attach to union membership.  You won&#039;t get any of your money back; all you will get is the knowledge that you&#039;ve just paid more for collective bargaining so others, who &quot;consent&quot; to political spending, can pay less for theirs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>To some people this is a choice. But you can also opt-out of giving to the union money that is not used for collective bargaining.</p></blockquote>
<p>No, you can&#8217;t.  I know this firsthand because I&#8217;ve tried.  The only thing you can opt out of is formal membership in the union, the right to vote in the union decisions, and any other fringe benefits that may attach to union membership.  You won&#8217;t get any of your money back; all you will get is the knowledge that you&#8217;ve just paid more for collective bargaining so others, who &#8220;consent&#8221; to political spending, can pay less for theirs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-38203</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/election-guide-november-2005/#comment-38203</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sure, you can quit your job and work in another industry. Some choice!&quot;

To some people this is a choice. But you can also opt-out of  giving to the union money that is not used for collective bargaining.

I never quite understood the idea of complaining about giving money to the union when the union increases your salary. Maybe it doesn&#039;t work out that its a benefit.

&quot;You just answered your own question.&quot;

I thought socialized medicine would be the state spending its money on the meds. Here it doesn&#039;t look like that is happening is it -- or happening to a greater degree?  Its basically negotiating a group plan with the purchasing power that it already has with cal-m no?

Or is there more expenditure on health care? If not, it looks like there might be more healthcare for less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sure, you can quit your job and work in another industry. Some choice!&#8221;</p>
<p>To some people this is a choice. But you can also opt-out of  giving to the union money that is not used for collective bargaining.</p>
<p>I never quite understood the idea of complaining about giving money to the union when the union increases your salary. Maybe it doesn&#8217;t work out that its a benefit.</p>
<p>&#8220;You just answered your own question.&#8221;</p>
<p>I thought socialized medicine would be the state spending its money on the meds. Here it doesn&#8217;t look like that is happening is it &#8212; or happening to a greater degree?  Its basically negotiating a group plan with the purchasing power that it already has with cal-m no?</p>
<p>Or is there more expenditure on health care? If not, it looks like there might be more healthcare for less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

