<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>damnum absque injuria</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Oh, Goody</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/09/oh-goody-3/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/09/oh-goody-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=5317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Louisiana law now forbids post-Katrina style disarmament, North Carolina General Statute 14-288.7 requires it.  WXII has more.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/09/oh-goody-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the &#8220;Antitrust Exemption&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/06/on-the-antitrust-exemption/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/06/on-the-antitrust-exemption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 02:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=5303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much political hay has been made of late over the McCarran-Ferguson Act, which is commonly but wrongly dubbed the &#8220;antitrust exemption&#8221; for insurers.  Past efforts have been made to repeal McCarran-Ferguson entirely (Patrick Leahy is big on this), but the latest incarnation, H.R. 3596, would make piecemeal changes to the Act for health and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/06/on-the-antitrust-exemption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Loser of the Day: Wesley Chapel High</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/06/loser-of-the-day-wesley-chapel-high/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/06/loser-of-the-day-wesley-chapel-high/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=5301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there&#8217;s one thing worse than a school having crappy test scores, it&#8217;s expelling the few students you have who get good test scores for complaining about your low test scores.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/06/loser-of-the-day-wesley-chapel-high/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jokester of the Day: Scott &#8220;HHOS&#8221; Brown</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/06/jokester-of-the-day-scott-hhos-brown/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/06/jokester-of-the-day-scott-hhos-brown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Liberal Morons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=5297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I never thought joke candidates won elections, particularly long shot ones, but Rhode Island Senator Patrick Kennedy thinks Scott Brown&#8217;s successful candidacy for U.S. Senate was a joke.  Not sure whether to chalk this up to &#8220;takes one to know one&#8221; or whether Kennedy himself is in on the joke.  After all, here&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/06/jokester-of-the-day-scott-hhos-brown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At Least He Didn&#8217;t Say It Was Akbarer Than Your Allahu</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/04/at-least-he-didnt-claim-it-was-akbarer-than-your-allahu/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/04/at-least-he-didnt-claim-it-was-akbarer-than-your-allahu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=5294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of all the pseudonyms I could have picked, why oh why did I settle for &#8220;Xrlq,&#8221; when Akbar Zeb would have been sooooooo much better?
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/04/at-least-he-didnt-claim-it-was-akbarer-than-your-allahu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the Kindle Kerfluffle</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/03/on-the-kindle-kerfluffle/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/03/on-the-kindle-kerfluffle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Products]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=5292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What he said.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/03/on-the-kindle-kerfluffle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Deepthought of the Day</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/02/legal-deepthought-of-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/02/legal-deepthought-of-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=5285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Criminal conversations is neither a crime nor a conversation.
Discuss.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/02/legal-deepthought-of-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote of the Day</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/01/31/quote-of-the-day-12/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2010/01/31/quote-of-the-day-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=5283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Si tratta con tutta probabilità di una bufala, e anche vecchiotta. L&#8217;originale era su www.ananova.com, ma non è più online, per una disamina vedi http://xrlq.com/2004/05/17/ananova-to-blogosphere-youve-been-punkd/&#8221;
Couldn&#8217;t have said it better myself.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2010/01/31/quote-of-the-day-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the Tebow Ad</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/01/31/on-the-tebow-ad/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2010/01/31/on-the-tebow-ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 01:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=5281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not sure why this (h/t: Sister Toldjah) is even controversial.  By all accounts, the ad is not going to argue that women have no right to abort; it will merely urge them to choose not to.  Which, one might think, would be A-O-K by all those self-described &#8220;pro-choicers&#8221; who steadfastly deny being [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2010/01/31/on-the-tebow-ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocka of the Day</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/01/30/shocka-of-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://xrlq.com/2010/01/30/shocka-of-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 03:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People Unclear On The Concept]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=5279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via Anwyn, a new study shows that laws prohibiting drivers from talking on hand-held cell phones, but not hands-free devices, have not reduced auto accidents in the four jurisdictions studied.  On a wholly unrelated note, another study concluded that laws forbidding drivers to drive under the influence of scotch, but not bourbon, have failed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://xrlq.com/2010/01/30/shocka-of-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.862 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-02-09 13:50:50 -->
