<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.9.1" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>damnum absque injuria</title>
	<link>http://xrlq.com</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Oh, Goody</title>
		<description><![CDATA[While Louisiana law now forbids post-Katrina style disarmament, North Carolina General Statute 14-288.7 requires it.  WXII has more.
]]></description>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/09/oh-goody-3/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>On the &#8220;Antitrust Exemption&#8221;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Much political hay has been made of late over the McCarran-Ferguson Act, which is commonly but wrongly dubbed the &#8220;antitrust exemption&#8221; for insurers.  Past efforts have been made to repeal McCarran-Ferguson entirely (Patrick Leahy is big on this), but the latest incarnation, H.R. 3596, would make piecemeal changes to the Act for health and [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/06/on-the-antitrust-exemption/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Loser of the Day: Wesley Chapel High</title>
		<description><![CDATA[If there&#8217;s one thing worse than a school having crappy test scores, it&#8217;s expelling the few students you have who get good test scores for complaining about your low test scores.
]]></description>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/06/loser-of-the-day-wesley-chapel-high/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Jokester of the Day: Scott &#8220;HHOS&#8221; Brown</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I never thought joke candidates won elections, particularly long shot ones, but Rhode Island Senator Patrick Kennedy thinks Scott Brown&#8217;s successful candidacy for U.S. Senate was a joke.  Not sure whether to chalk this up to &#8220;takes one to know one&#8221; or whether Kennedy himself is in on the joke.  After all, here&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/06/jokester-of-the-day-scott-hhos-brown/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>At Least He Didn&#8217;t Say It Was Akbarer Than Your Allahu</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Of all the pseudonyms I could have picked, why oh why did I settle for &#8220;Xrlq,&#8221; when Akbar Zeb would have been sooooooo much better?
]]></description>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/04/at-least-he-didnt-claim-it-was-akbarer-than-your-allahu/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>On the Kindle Kerfluffle</title>
		<description><![CDATA[What he said.
]]></description>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/03/on-the-kindle-kerfluffle/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Legal Deepthought of the Day</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Criminal conversations is neither a crime nor a conversation.
Discuss.
]]></description>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/02/02/legal-deepthought-of-the-day/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Quote of the Day</title>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Si tratta con tutta probabilità di una bufala, e anche vecchiotta. L&#8217;originale era su www.ananova.com, ma non è più online, per una disamina vedi http://xrlq.com/2004/05/17/ananova-to-blogosphere-youve-been-punkd/&#8221;
Couldn&#8217;t have said it better myself.
]]></description>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/01/31/quote-of-the-day-12/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>On the Tebow Ad</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not sure why this (h/t: Sister Toldjah) is even controversial.  By all accounts, the ad is not going to argue that women have no right to abort; it will merely urge them to choose not to.  Which, one might think, would be A-O-K by all those self-described &#8220;pro-choicers&#8221; who steadfastly deny being [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/01/31/on-the-tebow-ad/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Shocka of the Day</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Via Anwyn, a new study shows that laws prohibiting drivers from talking on hand-held cell phones, but not hands-free devices, have not reduced auto accidents in the four jurisdictions studied.  On a wholly unrelated note, another study concluded that laws forbidding drivers to drive under the influence of scotch, but not bourbon, have failed [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2010/01/30/shocka-of-the-day/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.408 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-02-09 09:13:41 -->
